One week of SDD in production: the numbers
The previous two posts made claims. This one is the data trail, pulled from the GitHub API across five repositories for the week of April 14–21, 2026.
Same workflow in every repo: spec written in Perplexity, implemented by Claude Code, validated by GitHub Actions, merged, deployed.
ericcaskey.com, first week (Apr 14–21, 2026)
The site launched during this window. Every number below is from week one.
| Metric | Count |
|---|---|
| PRs opened | 12 |
| PRs merged | 11 |
| Production deploys | 6 |
| Total CI pipeline runs | 20 |
| PR validation runs | 12 |
caskeycoding.com platform, cumulative (frontend + backend API + infra)
| Metric | Count |
|---|---|
| Frontend PRs merged | 27 |
| Frontend production deploys | 18 |
| Frontend CI pipeline runs | 57 |
| Backend API PRs merged | 57 |
| Backend API production deploys | 11 |
| Backend API CI pipeline runs | 100 |
| Infrastructure (CDK) PRs merged | 20 |
| Infrastructure deploys | 6 |
| Infrastructure CI pipeline runs | 45 |
Specs repo, first week (Apr 14–21, 2026)
| Metric | Count |
|---|---|
| Spec PRs merged | 51 |
Specs repo, cumulative
| Metric | Count |
|---|---|
| Spec files (markdown) | 138 |
| Total spec PRs merged | 59 |
The number worth pausing on
51 spec PRs merged in one week. That is not documentation overhead, that is the scaffolding that made the other hundred-plus code PRs safe to merge. 138 spec files drive production code across three code repos and a launch-week site.
Every one of those spec PRs was reviewed, gated by a voice scan and an NDA scan, and merged as a deliberate decision. None of them was generated as a byproduct of code. The spec PR always precedes the code PR, that is the whole discipline.
What to link
caskeycoding-specs-demo, the curated public demo repo. Point one spec in it: "here's what one of the 138 looks like."- ADR-003, Spec-Driven Development
- ADR-004, SDD File Structure
- Two commercial projects, a financial-position reviewer and an AI marathon coach, are in private development on the same workflow. Brand signal, not demonstration material.
Closer
The demo is public. The specs behind the numbers are private, on purpose. The rigor is visible either way.
Previous in the series: